Back to Course Overview

 

CHEM-1312 Content Audit Findings

Course: CHEM-1312 General Chemistry II Lecture

Audit Date: January 2026

Auditor: Tammy (Instructional Designer)

Subject Matter Expert: Agapito Serrato

πŸ“‹ Audit Overview

This document tracks the comprehensive content audit of CHEM-1312 lecture materials, identifying areas for improvement, content gaps, and enhancement opportunities for the Summer 2026 development cycle.

🎯 Audit Scope

Content Areas Reviewed

πŸ“Š Overall Assessment Status

Module Content Quality Learning Objectives Critical Issues Priority Level
Module 1: Chemical Bonding πŸ”΄ Major Content Gaps πŸ”΄ Objective-Content Mismatch Missing L4, Content Redistribution HIGH
Module 2: Intermolecular Forces 🟑 Good Foundation 🟑 Minor LO Issues Weak cognitive verbs MEDIUM
Module 3: Solution Properties 🟑 Structure Issues 🟑 Mixed Cognitive Levels L1-L2 overlap, 6 lessons/6 LOs MEDIUM
Module 4: Kinetics & Equilibrium πŸ”΄ Critical Errors πŸ”΄ Missing LO4.1.4, Wrong Module Numbering gaps, misaligned content HIGH
Module 5: Acids & Bases 🚨 Academic Crisis 🚨 Massive Undercoverage Major topic: 2 lessons only URGENT
Module 6: Thermodynamics 🟑 Moderate Compression 🟑 Enhancement Needed Limited computational focus MEDIUM
Module 7: Electrochemistry & Nuclear 🟒 Good Foundation 🟒 Well-Constructed Minor enhancements only LOW

Legend: 🟒 Good | 🟑 Needs Improvement | πŸ”΄ Major Revision Needed

πŸ” Detailed Module Analysis

The projects are listed not in module order but instead in priority order.

As major sections are done, you can shift the focus (accordion color red and expanded state) by updating the accordion item class to include "in-progress".

Module 5: Acids, Bases, and Solubility Equilibrium - IN-PROGRESS

β–Ό

Status: 🟒 RESOLVED - New Gap Analysis Available

πŸ“‹ Post-Restructure Gap Analysis (M5L1: Acid-Base Theory and Calculations)

Date: January 26, 2026

Lesson Focus: Comprehensive Chapter 15 coverage with proper pedagogical flow

Starred Learning Objectives for M5L1:

  • ⭐ LO5.1.1: Apply acid-base theories (BrΓΈnsted, Lewis) to identify conjugate pairs
  • ⭐ LO5.1.2: Calculate pH and pOH for strong and weak acid/base solutions

CONTENT STRENGTHS IDENTIFIED:

  • Video Content Coverage: Comprehensive theoretical foundation
    • Videos 001-011 provide complete Chapter 15 progression
    • Strong conceptual coverage: BrΓΈnsted-Lowry theory, pH/pOH scales, Ka/Kb relationships
    • Excellent progression from basic theory through advanced calculations
  • Reading Assignment: Complete Chapter 15 (15.1-15.12) - proper scope

CRITICAL GAPS REQUIRING IMMEDIATE ATTENTION:

πŸ”΄ LO5.1.1 Application Gap - "APPLY" Requirement

  • Current State: Theoretical knowledge only via videos
  • Missing: Interactive application activities for conjugate pair identification
  • Gap: Lewis acid-base theory entirely missing from video content
  • Needed:
    • Interactive drag-and-drop conjugate pair matching exercises
    • Practice problems for BrΓΈnsted-Lowry classification
    • Lewis acid-base theory content and activities
    • CidiLabs activities for acid-base theory application

πŸ“Ή Video Transcripts - Critical Development Resource

Status: 🟒 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSCRIPTS AVAILABLE

  • Module 1: Complete transcripts organized by lesson (L1-L4 folders)
  • Module 5: 15 video transcripts with cross-reference JSON for content mapping
  • Quality: Full SME explanations, concepts, examples, and teaching context
  • Organization: Numbered sequence with descriptive filenames
  • Utility: Essential for creating interactive content, problem sets, and assessments

Development Value for Future Sessions:

  • Content Extraction: Mine key concepts, examples, and explanations for lesson text
  • Problem Development: Use SME examples as basis for calculation problems
  • Assessment Creation: Extract conceptual questions and scenarios
  • Interactive Activity Design: Identify classification tasks and concept relationships
  • Real-World Applications: Capture SME's practical examples and context

Location Pattern: [module-folder]/video-transcripts/ - Available for Modules 1 and 5, check other modules

πŸ”΄ LO5.1.2 Calculation Gap - "CALCULATE" Requirement

  • Current State: Conceptual knowledge present, no guided practice
  • Missing: Step-by-step calculation activities and problem sets
  • Gap: No hands-on pH/pOH calculation practice despite strong conceptual videos
  • Needed:
    • Guided calculation modules for strong/weak acids and bases
    • Interactive problem sets with automatic feedback
    • Progressive difficulty levels (simple β†’ complex calculations)
    • Real-world application problems (physiological pH, buffer systems)

🟑 Assessment and Verification Gaps

  • Missing: Formative assessments after video content
  • Missing: Self-assessment quizzes and knowledge checks
  • Missing: Applied problem-solving activities

PRIORITY ADDITIONS RECOMMENDED:

  1. High Priority: Interactive conjugate pair identification activity
  2. High Priority: Guided pH calculation tutorials with practice problems
  3. Medium Priority: Lewis acid-base theory content integration
  4. Medium Priority: Comprehensive formative assessment module

PEDAGOGICAL ASSESSMENT: Lesson has excellent theoretical foundation through videos but lacks the practical application components required by the "Apply" and "Calculate" action verbs in learning objectives. The gap between knowledge and application must be bridged through interactive activities.

Module 1: Chemical Bonding and Molecular Geometry

β–Ό

Status: πŸ”΄ Major Content-Objective Gaps Identified

πŸ“‹ Lesson Objective Analysis - MAJOR GAPS FOUND

L1: Chemical Bonding and Molecular Geometry

Stated Objective: β˜… LO1.1.1 Identify different types of geometries

Actual Content Coverage:

  • Chemical bonding fundamentals (ionic, covalent, Lewis structures)
  • Lattice energy and Born-Haber cycle
  • Bond types and characteristics
  • ❌ CRITICAL GAP: Minimal molecular geometry coverage
  • ❌ MISSING: VSEPR theory application
  • ❌ MISSING: Specific geometry identification (linear, tetrahedral, etc.)

Content Analysis: L1 focuses heavily on bonding theory but fails to deliver on its primary objective of geometry identification. Only brief mentions of 3D structure vs 2D Lewis structures.

L2: Dipole Moments (folder naming issue)

Stated Objective: β˜… LO1.1.2 Identify dipole moments

Actual Content Coverage:

  • Electronegativity fundamentals
  • Bond polarity classification
  • Formal charge calculations
  • ❌ CRITICAL GAP: No actual dipole moment identification
  • ❌ MISSING: Dipole vector calculations
  • ❌ MISSING: Molecular polarity determination

Content Analysis: L2 covers prerequisite concepts but does not address its stated objective of dipole moment identification.

L3: Valence Bond Theory

Stated Objective: β˜… LO1.1.3 Classify the Valence Bond Theory

Actual Content Coverage:

  • VSEPR theory (excellent coverage)
  • Molecular geometry types (AB2, AB3, AB4, AB5, AB6)
  • 3D molecular structure representation
  • Dipole moments (advanced coverage)
  • ❌ PARTIAL GAP: Limited valence bond theory classification
  • ❌ MISSING: Hybridization theory
  • ❌ MISSING: Orbital overlap concepts

Content Analysis: L3 paradoxically contains the best molecular geometry content (addressing L1's objective) and dipole content (addressing L2's objective) while not fully covering its own stated objective.

L4: Molecular Orbital Theory

Stated Objective: LO1.1.4 Classify the Molecular Orbital Theory

Current Status: ❌ CRITICAL: No HTML lesson file exists, only empty video_transcripts folder

Content Coverage: πŸ”΄ COMPLETELY MISSING

🚨 URGENT CORRECTIONS REQUIRED

Immediate Actions Needed:

  1. L1 Content Addition: Add molecular geometry identification content to meet LO1.1.1
  2. L2 Content Addition: Add actual dipole moment identification content to meet LO1.1.2
  3. L3 Content Refocus: Add valence bond theory classification while maintaining geometry content
  4. L4 Critical Gap: Create complete lesson for Molecular Orbital Theory (LO1.1.4)

Recommended Content Redistribution:

  • L1: Keep bonding fundamentals + ADD geometry identification from L3
  • L2: Keep electronegativity + ADD dipole content from L3
  • L3: Keep VSEPR + ADD valence bond/hybridization theory
  • L4: CREATE complete molecular orbital theory lesson

Content Organization Issues Identified

🚨 LESSON NAMING DISCREPANCY - REQUIRES SME APPROVAL

Issue: L2 lesson is named "L2_Diplole Moments" but contains foundational electronegativity content, while the actual detailed dipole moments content is in L3.

Details:

  • L2 Actual Content: Electronegativity, Classification of Ionic Character, Formal Charges (foundational concepts)
  • L3 Contains: Advanced Dipole Moments video covering molecular geometry effects on dipoles, VSEPR applications, net dipole calculations
  • Folder Name Issue: "L2_Diplole Moments" has spelling error (missing 'o') and misrepresents content

SME Review Required:

  • Confirm content placement is pedagogically correct
  • Approve potential folder rename: "L2_Electronegativity_and_Bond_Polarity"
  • Fix spelling error in current folder name
  • Verify learning objective alignment

Recommendation: Content is correctly placed; only lesson naming needs SME approval for correction.

Priority Actions (Summer 2026)

  1. URGENT: Create L4 Molecular Orbital Theory lesson from scratch
  2. HIGH: Add geometry identification content to L1
  3. HIGH: Add dipole moment identification to L2
  4. MEDIUM: Add valence bond theory content to L3
  5. SME Consultation: Review L2 naming discrepancy and get approval for correction

πŸ§ͺ Lab Course Content Analysis - Gap-Filling Opportunities

β–Ό

Analysis Date: January 25, 2026

Lab Content Source: LAB_M2_Explore_Molecular_Geometry_and_Molecular_Geometry.html

🎯 Lab Course Learning Objectives

  • LO2.1.1: Predict molecular structures using VSEPR Theory
  • LO2.1.2: Interpret atomic dipoles to identify molecular polarity
  • LO2.1.3: Determine crystal structure of several molecules

πŸ“‹ Lab Content That Can Fill Lecture Gaps

For L1 Gap (Molecular Geometry Identification - LO1.1.1)

Available Lab Content:

  • Comprehensive VSEPR Theory section with 12:28 video explanation
  • Interactive molecular geometry flipcards with 3D Sketchfab models:
    • Linear (COβ‚‚) with 3D visualization
    • Tetrahedral (CHβ‚„) with 3D visualization
    • Trigonal Pyramidal (NH₃) with 3D visualization
    • Trigonal Bipyramidal with 3D visualization
  • Clear geometry naming conventions and angle descriptions
  • Polarity identification linked to geometry (polar vs non-polar)

Recommendation: Transfer the VSEPR theory section and molecular geometry flipcards from lab to L1 lecture content.

For L2 Gap (Dipole Moment Identification - LO1.1.2)

Available Lab Content:

  • Electronegativity foundation with visual periodic table trends
  • Polar vs Non-polar covalent bond explanations
  • Molecular polarity determination based on geometry
  • Practical examples of polar (NH₃) vs non-polar (CHβ‚„, COβ‚‚) molecules
  • Interactive flipcard activities connecting geometry to polarity

Recommendation: Use the lab's polarity determination content and geometry-polarity connection activities for L2.

πŸ› οΈ High-Value Interactive Elements from Lab

Ready-to-Use Interactive Tools:

  1. Lewis Dot Diagram Practice: External tool at edutechtammy.github.io/lewis-dot-diagrams/
  2. Molecule Builder: External tool at elearning.cpp.edu/learning-objects/making-molecules/
  3. 3D Molecular Models: Sketchfab embedded models for each geometry type
  4. Electronegativity flipcards: Element β†’ valence electron count practice
  5. Geometry identification flipcards: Visual structure β†’ name/polarity/example

πŸ“Š Content Transfer Priority Matrix

Content Type L1 Priority L2 Priority L3 Priority Implementation Effort
VSEPR Theory Video πŸ”΄ CRITICAL 🟑 Helpful 🟒 Supplementary Low - Direct embed
Geometry Flipcards πŸ”΄ CRITICAL 🟑 Helpful 🟑 Helpful Low - Copy/adapt
3D Sketchfab Models πŸ”΄ CRITICAL 🟑 Helpful 🟑 Helpful Low - Direct embed
Polarity Explanations 🟑 Helpful πŸ”΄ CRITICAL 🟑 Helpful Low - Text adaptation
Electronegativity Tools 🟑 Helpful πŸ”΄ CRITICAL 🟒 Supplementary Low - Direct embed
Lewis Structure Tools 🟒 Good to have 🟑 Helpful πŸ”΄ CRITICAL Low - Direct embed

Module 2: Intermolecular Forces of Liquids and Solids

β–Ό

Status: πŸ”΄ Major Learning Objective Issues Identified

Issues Identified

  • Learning objectives need pedagogical enhancement (weak cognitive verbs)
  • Content quality is good but objectives don't reflect depth
  • Minor content-objective alignment improvements needed

Required Changes

  • Revise learning objectives for pedagogical soundness (elevate "describe" to "analyze")
  • Enhance L2 to explicitly connect forces to properties
  • Add application exercises throughout module
  • Strengthen IMF-crystal property connections

Module 3: Physical and Colligative Properties of Solutions

β–Ό

Status: 🟑 Structure Issues with Mixed Cognitive Levels

Issues Identified

  • L1-L2 content overlap violates 1:1 lesson-objective alignment
  • Mixed cognitive levels in learning objectives ("describe" + "infer")
  • 6 lessons for 6 objectives creates potential fragmentation

Required Changes

  • Resolve L1-L2 structure and content overlap issues
  • Enhance learning objectives for consistent cognitive progression
  • Clarify lesson boundaries and eliminate redundancy
  • Add thermodynamic connections to temperature effects

Module 4: Chemical Kinetics and Chemical Equilibrium

β–Ό

Status: πŸ”΄ Critical Errors - Missing LO4.1.4, Wrong Module Assignments

Critical Issues Identified

  • Missing LO4.1.4 (numbering jumps from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5)
  • Wrong module objective (LO3.1.5 belongs in Module 3)
  • Poor lesson-objective mapping (L5 marked with wrong objective)
  • Content-objective mismatches throughout

Urgent Actions Required

  • Fix learning objective numbering and module assignment errors
  • Create missing LO4.1.4 for temperature/activation energy content
  • Realign lessons with correct objectives
  • Enhance learning objectives for better cognitive progression

Module 6: Entropy, Enthalpy, and Free Energy

β–Ό

Status: 🟑 Moderate Compression - Limited Computational Focus

Issues Identified

  • Important topic compressed to 3 lessons (standard coverage: 4-6 lessons)
  • Limited computational focus despite module title promising enthalpy coverage
  • Missing temperature effects and coupled reactions
  • Content quality good but enhancement opportunities exist

Enhancement Strategy

  • Add computational focus to existing learning objectives
  • Enhance enthalpy coverage to match module title promise
  • Develop calculation practice for Ξ”H, Ξ”S, Ξ”G
  • Add temperature-dependent thermodynamics applications

Module 7: Electrochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry

β–Ό

Status: 🟒 Good Foundation with Enhancement Opportunities

Issues Identified

  • Quantitative balance: Nuclear chemistry needs calculation integration
  • Assessment gaps: Limited practice problems for nuclear topics
  • Content integration: Could better connect electrochemical and nuclear principles
  • LO enhancement: Minor objective language improvements possible

Enhancement Strategy

  • Add nuclear chemistry calculations (half-life, decay equations)
  • Develop integrated problem sets combining both topics
  • Enhance nuclear fusion coverage for topical balance
  • Minor learning objective language improvements

🎯 Cross-Course Coordination Findings

CHEM-1112 Lab Integration

πŸ“š Assessment and Rubric Audit

Assessment Type Quantity Quality Alignment Action Needed
Module Quizzes 6 🟑 🟒 Review & Update
Practice Problems Variable 🟑 🟑 Standardize
Midterm Exams 2 🟒 🟒 Minor Updates
Final Exam 1 🟑 🟒 Content Review
Homework Sets 6 πŸ”΄ 🟑 Major Revision

🎯 Summer 2026 Development Priorities

Phase 1: Critical Issues (Weeks 1-4) - URGENT

  1. Module 5: Complete restructuring - academic crisis requires immediate attention
  2. Module 4: Fix critical learning objective errors and numbering issues
  3. Module 1: Create missing L4 Molecular Orbital Theory lesson
  4. Assessment framework development for restructured modules

Phase 2: High Priority Enhancements (Weeks 5-8)

  1. Module 1: Add content redistribution for geometry and dipole objectives
  2. Module 4: Realign lessons with corrected objectives
  3. Module 6: Add computational focus and enthalpy coverage
  4. Modules 2-3: Learning objective enhancements and structure fixes

Phase 3: Medium Priority & Quality Assurance (Weeks 9-12)

  1. Module 7: Add nuclear chemistry calculations and integrated assessments
  2. Interactive element development across all enhanced modules
  3. Comprehensive SME review and approval
  4. Final preparation for Fall 2026 deployment

πŸ“ˆ Success Metrics

Content Quality Indicators

Process Improvements

πŸ“ž Review and Approval Process

Weekly Reviews

Monthly SME Reviews

Mid-Development Review

πŸ“ Change Log

January 2026

Next Review Date: February 2026

Document Owner: Tammy (Instructional Designer)

Last Updated: January 25, 2026